The Power Of Friends and Neighbors by marilyn salenger

During these very difficult times, the power of friends and neighbors has become an unexpected light shining through the darkness. As someone who has been put in a category I never asked for - high risk - I’ve found some incredible and very special moments these days with friends and neighbors and those close by whom I never met. Their unsolicited offers of help to get everything from people food to pet food and Tylenol into my house, without ever seeing me, has turned a big city into a small neighborhood that will never again be quite the same.

The story below highlights some of my life in the not so fast lane. Here’s to birthdays that don’t involve a pandemic! Stay safe and healthy everyone.

Previously published in the Washington Post

Neighbors want to help during the pandemic. These women prove that.

(iStock; Lily illustrations)

(iStock; Lily illustrations)

Lena Felton . March 16. The Lily

For Marilyn Salenger, the stress of the last few days has been acute. She’s been trying to overcome feeling “locked in” since Friday, when President Trump declared the coronavirus outbreak a national emergency. As a 75-year-old, immunocompromised woman living alone, Salenger is considered an at-risk population for the disease. She hasn’t left her Washington, D.C., apartment much at all in the last few days.

But when she logged onto the neighborhood social network Nextdoor on Sunday, she was “taken aback.” There was a post from a woman living close by that promised: “We’re here to help!” Kathleen Borgueta, a 33-year-old public health worker, was offering to run errands for anyone in the area. Dozens of neighbors responded, promising to offer a helping hand in whatever way they could, too.

“It made the day so much easier to deal with,” Salenger says over the phone, describing her reaction to the post. She ended up replying with a thank you on the thread — and allowing herself to be “vulnerable” by identifying as someone in that high-risk category. “Even though I didn’t ask anyone in particular for help, just knowing that these wonderful people who are my neighbors who I don’t know offered to help if I needed it — not just me personally — it meant a great deal,” she says.

As normal life comes to a halt across the country, people are reaching out on social media platforms, doling out similar offers. This is playing out locally, as in Salenger and Borgueta’s case, and on a larger scale. Some people have been creating spreadsheets — in which people can post financial offers or requests — that are meant to help those whose work is impacted by the shutdowns.

This type of good will from others is common when it comes to public health crises, according to Dina Borzekowski, interim director of the Global Health Initiative at University of Maryland’s School of Public Health. “People in emergency situations, whether they’re natural disasters or man-made disasters, do reach out to others,” she says. “The panic that we see in movies and on television shows or mythology is just that.”

Famous people, too, have been offering personal assistance. Writer Roxane Gay, for example, had a Twitter post go viral after promising to Venmo $100 to the first 10 people in need.

roxane gay✔@rgay

If you are broke and need to stock up on groceries I will Venmo you $100. Like 10 people. It’s not much but I know it’s rough out there. Reply with yr Venmo

Madison Pickett, a 27-year-old seamstress living in Chicago, was one of the recipients of Gay’s $100 Venmo. Her boyfriend is an independent contractor working in event production, which means he’s completely out of work with no safety net right now. After replying to Gay’s tweet, though, the money didn’t stop there — others began sending Pickett money as well. In the end, she received $350 from about 15 different people.

“It’s wild,” Pickett says. “I almost didn’t like it. It made me feel guilty all that came to me. Not that I’m not in need of it, but I was really just kind of blown away by it.”

The idea of financial help has been picking up steam online. Last week — around the time that many workplaces began implementing work-from-home policies — Binya Koatz posted on Facebook. A 25-year-old software engineer living in the San Francisco Bay area, Koatz believed that people still receiving an income should be helping out those who might be laid off because of the pandemic.

One of her friends created a Google spreadsheet that could facilitate pairing donors with people in need. Within a day, they’d managed to transfer $450. Several days later, that amount has grown to $40,000. So far, they haven’t encountered any bad actors. But the demand still far outweighs the donations, Koatz says; they’re still trying to get white-collar workers to help out.

For Koatz, the most rewarding story she’s heard so far was from a transgender man living in Europe, who needed a small amount of money to make rent. “You see the way this coronavirus can compound already disastrous social circumstances,” she says. “And just being able to connect with him and share what was a very small amount of money to help him survive — I’m trans also — that was an incredibly beautiful and meaningful experience.”

For Borgueta, too, her Nextdoor post was about addressing disparities. She’s lived in D.C. for about 15 years now, and it has made her “painfully aware of the gaps in health care” in the city, she says.

Borgueta was unsurprised that most of the replies to her thread — which was posted to the feed for Logan Circle, a wealthier neighborhood in the District — were promises of additional offers to help, instead of requests. She’s still trying to figure out ways to connect to the communities that she feels are most at risk.

What’s most important, Borgueta says, is that after this initial outpouring of support, people continue to be there when their neighbors need the help. As she puts it: “A couple weeks from now, maybe when it’s harder to be optimistic or make an extra run, that’s when it really matters.”

As the crisis continues to worsen — six counties in the Bay Area were ordered to “shelter in place” Monday — it’s also important to take stock of how to help “safely,” says Eva Enns, a health policy professor at the University of Minnesota and an infectious diseases expert. Although it’s important to “reorient our societal values around getting through this and toward that neighborly support,” she says, “the social distancing component is so important.”

Enns suggests helping out in ways that don’t necessarily require contact — picking up groceries for neighbors and literally leaving them outside their doors is a good start. It’s most vital to support the workers whose jobs will continue to be essential to keep society running: those in health care, but also those with jobs such as trash collecting.

“We should all be working to make sure that people can be safe, that they can get through this, and the people that need to keep working can keep working,” says Enns. “Everything else can wait.”

For the time being, Salenger is holding onto the “unexpectedness” of the good will of others. She was supposed to celebrate her 76th birthday on Wednesday in New York with family. Instead, she’ll be staying inside her apartment in D.C.

Even more than the Nextdoor post, what gives her hope are the couple of real-life neighbors who have reached out to help. One brought her dinner the other night; another offered to take her dog for a walk. If anything, Salenger says, the crisis “has brought out the best in a city. And it just keeps coming.”

Bernie Sanders Unsettling Trump-Like Behavior by marilyn salenger

Bernie 2020 debate 2.jpg

When we choose to ignore recent history repeating itself, it’s hard to fault anyone but ourselves. During these past four years, we have watched Donald Trump focus almost exclusively on playing to his base as a means to win victory. Trump remade the use of a political base by moving its power to meet his own needs with little regard for the rest of the country, let alone the greater good. That’s where Senator Bernie Sanders’s candidacy raises warning flags.

Are we really ready to have another President who will manipulate the use of his political base to pull the entire country to yet another extreme?

While at opposite ends of the political spectrum, Sanders is playing to his base of supporters in much the same way as Trump, and he’s using a few too many Trump-like techniques and behaviors to win the Democratic nomination. Sanders, a self-proclaimed democratic socialist, continually speaks about building a revolution and movement to keep his support intact. Trump created his own kind of movement with “Make American Great Again,” and would like to think it built a Trump revolution.

Bernie has perfected turning his own rallies into shows that are looking a lot like Trump rallies. The large crowds that gather for Sanders’s see a candidate filled with increasingly visible and vocal anger as he addresses them. His mood is directed at the so-called political establishment, and it appears to be rubbing off on his young supporters. It’s far from the positive role modeling that he’d like us to think it is.

Too many of Sanders’s followers have taken to lashing out at those who disagree with them by using Twitter and Facebook bullying, booing of speakers, and any other way they can think of to show us that anger against the status quo is driving their support of Sanders. It’s the same kind of anger that Trump loves to use to rev up his own troops.

We were able to see Sanders in action in front of an audience during a recent CNN Town Hall in Charleston, South Carolina. It was an unexpected glimpse at how he works with a crowd, even when being interviewed by a moderator. In the course of conversation, Sanders turned to the audience and encouraged them to respond to his statements in unison:

Sanders: “Is raising the minimum wage to $15 an hour a radical idea?” The rousing audience response: “No!”

Sanders: “Is guaranteeing healthcare to all people as a human right a radical idea"?” The rousing audience response: “No!”

After a few more refrains of a similar nature, I was taken aback. We’ve watched Trump use this technique many times. The similarities did not a comfort level bring. Nor did the use of this CNN Town Hall exchange in a Sanders’s Instagram ad that read:

“Bernie asked the crowd if our ideas are radical. Their answers were perfect…” (Sound comes up to the audience exchange noted above)

“join the movement.”

For a candidate who prides himself on being a man of the people, Sanders and his ad team appeared totally tone deaf using the word “perfect’ to describe a reaction to something Sanders did on stage. Perfect has become a loaded political word since Trump used it to describe his now infamous call with the President of Ukraine.

Sanders is playing the loyalty game with his supporters in a way no other Democratic candidate is doing. It’s the kind of loyalty based on inclusion that ominously reeks of exclusion if you don’t agree. Sanders steadfastly carries the banner of running as a democratic socialist. He doesn’t talk about pulling the country together under Democratic party principles, but he wants the Democratic nomination. And he wants it his way.

Four years ago Bernie Sanders needed to be pushed to finally throw his support behind Hillary Clinton. Many questioned how hard he actually pushed his supporters to work for the Democratic nominee. In August of 2017, the results of an enormous election survey of 500,000 people showed that 12% of people who voted for Sanders in the 2016 Democratic presidential primaries voted for Donald Trump in the general election.

Share

Job Security Or National Security For Republicans Voting On Impeachment? by marilyn salenger

Congress is about to go through the process of impeaching Donald Trump, the 45th President of the United States. We as a nation are faced with a determining question for those chosen to represent us in Congress: “Are you living in partisan fear of doing or not doing the right thing?”

In recent weeks we have heard more about our Constitution than since the impeachment of President Bill Clinton. The reasons are many that come back to one. The Constitution is our governing document. While it spells out the facts necessary to bring an impeachment, the Constitution never intended it to be based upon partisanship.

The Senate will convene an impeachment trial based upon articles of impeachment drafted by the House of Representatives. The articles will show a President who abused the powers of his office and chose self over country repeatedly. In its most imperative, President Trump has chosen self over our national security and the safety of our elections.

The president will be accused of withholding funds approved by a bipartisan congressional vote to assist our ally Ukraine in fighting our mutual enemy, Russia. His goal in withholding those funds has been found to dismiss national security concerns, focusing instead on enlisting a foreign government’s help in his upcoming re-election effort.

The now infamous telephone call between President Trump and the newly elected President of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelensky, in which the “ask” was made has been detailed in numerous documents and by multiple witnesses. Trump appointed NATO Ambassador Gordon Sondland. testified under oath that Trump asked Zelensky to obtain “dirt” on potential Trump 2020 opponent Joe Biden.

It is not the first time that Donald Trump has sought to a enlist foreign government’s involvement in our elections. During a 2016 campaign appearance Trump reached out to Russia on national television asking for their help finding Hillary Clinton emails. The dangerous pattern began:

“Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing. I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.”

That same day, the Russians made their first effort to break into the computer servers used by Mrs. Clinton’s personal office. A sweeping 29-page indictment by the special counsel’s office charged 12 Russians with election hacking.

During the upcoming impeachment trial, each member of the Senate will have the opportunity to vote on the removal of President Trump from office. It is meant as an act of grave responsibility. It is not meant as a responsibility to act in the best of the Republican party or the Democratic party, but to act with independence. The impeachment of the President of the United States is not the time to tow a party line. By its very nature, it must be based upon facts.

But the current roster of Republicans has twisted those facts to such a degree that they have shown, thus far, the ability to ignore experts and witnesses. They have created a line of thinking that enables them to cement themselves to Trump’s side, whether he is guilty or not. The Republican men and women of the Senate, with rare exception at this point, appear afraid to stand up for themselves.

The current thinking is that the majority of Republicans who control the Senate will vote to support Trump’s ability to stay in office because they are afraid not to do so. They want to keep their jobs. That is what appears to be number one in most Republican Senator’s minds. No matter the facts presented during the impeachment process, They have bought into fearing the vindictiveness of Donald Trump whose vitriol threatens their political careers.

The fact that impeachment has become about Republican job security and not national security goes against every basis of right and wrong. It is an extraordinary time in which the power of each member of the Senate holds forth an outcome that will directly impact our country as a whole.

Does each Senator have the guts to vote without self interest in mind? That is the question that every Republican and Democrat voter must ask themselves as well. This is a time when doing what is best for our country and our national security, preserving our elections free from interference by any foreign country, is paramount.

If no man or woman who holds the office of Senator has the ability to think beyond themselves while holding facts in hand and mind, they deserve to not be re-elected. Let us as a people remember that no good comes out of governing based upon fear.

Four Years and Counting by marilyn salenger

White House at Night.jpg

Political & Otherwise was first introduced four years ago in October of 2015. The presidential campaign was in full swing and we were just beginning to see and feel the true impact a man named Donald Trump as a political figure. The Republicans running against Trump filled the stage. Jeb Bush, Chris Christie, Ted Cruz, Carly Fiorina, Jim Gilmore, Lindsey Graham, Mike Huckabee, Bobby Jindal, John Kasich, George Pataki, Rand Paul, Rick Perry, Marco Rubio, Rick Santorum and Scott Walker. My how quickly we forget. On the Democratic side Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders had squared off against each other with polls showing a large lead for Hillary. Four of the most tumultuous years of political history were beginning to make their mark creating a political headache for us, even back then.

The first piece I wrote for Political & Otherwise was about The 2016 Presidential Campaign and Our Kids. It was short and to the point then, and in retrospect, very much to the point now. Those who will be old enough to vote for the first time in the 2020 presidential election were freshman in high school four years ago. They have been listening, seeing and reading all this time while soaking up the winds of all going on around them, intentionally or not. It’s been hard not to.

We as a country have helped raise a generation of young people who have grown up against a backdrop of the unfathomable. Hearing a President of the United States spew hateful rhetoric while doing his best to make that seem normal. Tragically witnessing or being a part of a record number of mass shootings. Living in a time where hate crimes have surged. Watching immigrants coming to our country be put in cages and separated from their own children. And hearing a continual stream of lies about reality become commonplace. They have come of age learning a new term - fake news.

The counter to fake news is facts. People have to want to take the time to learn the truths and challenge themselves to think otherwise before judgements are made. Will younger people be more willing to do that than their elders? They appear to be on media overload as they sort through all of the ways available to access information. Nine out of ten college students get their news from at least five different sources in a given week, according to a year long survey of 6,000 college students. While accessing diverse sources of information is generally considered a positive when it comes to decision making, it may be making it harder for them to glean real from fake. And that’s a problem for everyone.

Growing up today for too many is far removed from a state of innocence that every child deserves, at least in part, in their early years. By the time our kids started high school four years ago, we had elected a man as President who lost the popular vote and had already begun his descent into some of the lowest depths possible in a democratic state.

Donald Trump is now about to be impeached. Our younger generation has not stopped listening. The overwhelming majority of college students support impeachment to an even greater extent than the general public, according to a recent College Reaction poll:

 Students               General public

Dems                               97%                           84%

Independents                76%                           45%

GOP                                 22%                           14%

The last sentence I wrote in that first post on October 8, 2015 was:

“Do we really want our kids to learn that the way you get to be President of the United States, the highest political office in the land, is by bullying, bigotry, prejudice, sexism and anger?”

Biden Today: Which Democrat Will Trump Go After Tomorrow? by marilyn salenger

Photo by Gage Skidmore/CC BY-SA2.0

Photo by Gage Skidmore/CC BY-SA2.0

We’re being gravely naive if we think that Donald Trump and his pal and lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, are only spending their behind the scenes time talking to Ukrainian officials about Joe Biden in an effort to undermine the Democratic presidential frontrunner. It’s Ukraine and Biden today, but who knows who it will be tomorrow. They’ll go after whomever is leading the Democratic race in opposition to Trump’s re-election bid, despite the legality or illegality involved. It’s the way they think and operate. To them, there are no rules.

While Democrats might think they’re prepared, given Trump’s previous campaign tactics, no candidate running against Trump can run without looking over his or her shoulder.

Two years after Trump’s inauguration, the Mueller Report confirmed that Russia absolutely interfered in the 2016 election. Trump asked for Russia’s help on national television, and he got it. What consequence did our President pay for his actions? None. But 34 Trump allies were indicted, including senior members of the Trump campaign. Since Trump got away with it once before, he apparently thinks he can get away with it again. Maybe he’ll even throw Giuliani under the bus.

A whistleblower has stepped up to reportedly let us know Trump has tried a theme and variation on his Russia election scenario with Ukrainian officials in anticipation of the 2020 election. Now exposed, Trump admits that he called the President of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelensky, asking him to dig up dirt on former Vice President Joe Biden. He brazenly did so the day after Special Counsel Robert Mueller finished testifying before Congress. In his mind, if there was no price to pay, why not?

The Trump re-election apparatus continues to focus on the Donald Trump who sees himself as a true star surrounded by the millions who follow him on social media, almost 65 million on Twitter alone. And a cable network he often refers to as his own. But the tentacles of reach are too often filled with toxins ready to poison.

Elizabeth Warren dealt with Trump’s name calling when she ran in 2016, but now the heat is turned up much higher. Her crowd sizes are rivaling his and her poll numbers are rising. That’s a definite way to touch off negative Trump behavior. But how much? He’s an unchecked loose cannon playing around with our democracy.

Trump never saw Bernie Sanders as a serious threat in 2016, and I don’t think that’s changed today. Whatever he’s already gotten on Bernie is only being updated because he hasn’t had to use it - yet. Sanders, Warren and Biden, at this early date, are the candidates who show the best chance of beating the man elected president last time. A recent Fox News election poll has Trump losing to all three.

The next tier of candidates, Pete Butitigieg and Kamala Harris, haven’t been consistently polling high enough to make Trump worry much about them. But their histories, their families, their actions at any point in their lives are all fair game in Trump campaign land.

Donald Trump has done his best to make politics the dirtiest game in town. He has never cared who he hurt in the process of winning, or how much he jeopardized the safety and security of our country, or how little respect he shows the Constitution that was created to guide us. Trump is a dangerous and vicious politician who will do anything to win re-election.

It's Time For President Obama To Speak Out by marilyn salenger

Inauguration Day 2017

Inauguration Day 2017

Our country is being split apart by a President who operates from the gutter and a Republican party that is going along for the ride. The extent of the damage that Donald Trump is doing to the United States won’t fully be known for decades, but we are living in the here and now and can no longer allow Trump’s racism and xenophobia to be a continuing path of governance.

Donald Trump has repeatedly used the power of the presidency to spew hatred and bigotry without remorse. There is no justification for his behavior or the denigration of the highest elected office in the land. Every time Donald Trump goes on the attack people think he can’t go much lower. But then the next time, and the next time, he does just that. This past weekend Trump went too far.    

Using the pulpit of the POTUS Twitter account, he spoke words of outright racist and xenophobic hatred for four freshman Democratic Congresswomen of color. He told Representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, Ilhan Omar of Minnesota (born in Somalia), Rashida Tlaib of Michigan and Ayanna S. Pressley of Massachusetts:

“…go back and help fix the totally broken and crime infested places from which they came. Then come back and show us how it is done.”

Telling a person of color to “go back to where you come from” is a comment too painfully well known by minorities. It reeks “you don’t belong here.” It was bad enough that Trump uttered the words in the first place, but then he defended himself the next day saying,

“It doesn’t concern me because many people agree with me.”

With the affirmation of his own bigoted remarks, Donald Trump publicly condoned racism and xenophobia to the entire world. To him, using that spear is only politics. But it’s the politics that’s letting him get away with it all.

To ask a bigot, “Why?” is to ask a question for which there is no rational intelligent answer. To ask Trump’s fellow Republicans why they, for the most part, remain silent is to understand the extent to which Donald Trump governs by fear.

This new silent majority is afraid they won’t get re-elected if they speak out because Trump will intercede. Pathetically, job security is what it’s all about for these Republicans. Their weakness has done nothing but embolden Donald Trump. It’s disgraceful. Those who remain silent should lose their seats simply because they have remained silent.

There is no living Democrat whose voice is as strong as that of President Barack Obama’s in speaking out against racial injustice and bigotry. As the first African American president elected by our country, Obama’s voice carries power unlike any other for the times in which we now live.

There is no former president who understands how it personally feels to be on the receiving end of Trump’s abject racism. A former president whose own birthright was ignorantly challenged by Trump’s racist taunts. Barack Obama’s voice needs to be heard once again as a clarion call to unite as much of our country as possible, and stem the fallout of the racial divide created by today’s politics.

President Obama, break your silence. These are not normal times in which former Presidents keep their thoughts to themselves out of respect for the office. This is not about endorsing a current Democratic presidential candidate. This call to you is made out of the great need we as a nation have to hear sanity again in an effort to stop the breaking apart that is taking place. We understand after shaking the new President’s hand and wishing him well in January 2017, you hoped for the best for all of us. But it’s come down to living with the worst unchecked presidential behavior our democracy has witnessed.

 

If Men Got Pregnant Abortion Wouldn’t Be An Issue; Same Old Story by marilyn salenger

We are once again faced with the reality of what a war on women looks like, and it’s ugly. The same old story. Women are the ones who get pregnant, and men are the ones who feel entitled to make laws that govern the privacy of our bodies and reproductive rights. With the debate now raging across our country, a new wave of state abortion laws takes us back to the dark ages with a vengeance.

Something is very wrong with this picture in 2019 almost 50 years after the landmark Supreme Court ruling Roe v. Wade legalized abortion. In 1973 that law took abortion out of the alleys and bathrooms of my mother’s and grandmothers’ generations, and opened the doors to safety in medical settings and reproductive freedom for women. Safety and choice. Two key words in the continuing abortion battle that should no longer be a battle at all. Remember them because their threat of disappearance is greater than it has been in decades.

Before Roe v. Wade, women who were desperate to end an unwanted pregnancy with little choice would resort to the worst imaginable scenarios. Coat hangers. Knitting needles. Scissors. Swallowing almost any toxic substance thought to create a self-induced abortion. Women who were married used these things in an effort to abort. Women who were single used these things in an effort to abort. Women who were raped used these things in an effort to abort. Women who were victims of incest used these things in an effort to abort. Tragically, too often those actions killed them or damaged them for life. Personal anguish met restrictive personal laws, and cries for help were repeatedly silenced.

The death tolls from illegal abortions were staggering. In 1965, illegal abortion accounted for 17% of all deaths attributed to pregnancy and childbirth. And these are only the numbers officially reported. The estimated number of illegal abortions in the 1950’s and 1960’s ranged from 200,000 to 1.2 million a year.

If Roe v. Wade is overturned, it will not stop abortions from taking place. Women’s lives, mentally, physically and financially are the ones at risk if forced to carry an unwanted pregnancy to term. We know from all of the years before legalization what will happen. Women who can afford to go somewhere safe and have the procedure done, will do so. Women who can’t afford to go outside of their home area will be forced to take matters into their own hands.

The attempt to overturn Roe v. Wade has been emboldened by the master of moral authority, President Donald Trump. He is a man who will use and manipulate any issue to meet his own needs when convenient. At the time he was playing around with women in New York City while married, he was a strong supporter of “choice” when it came to abortion. In a 1999 interview with Tim Russert Trump said:

“I’m very pro-choice. I hate the concept of abortion. I hate it. I hate everything it stands for, I cringe when I listen to people debating the subject, but still I just believe in choice.”

Fast forward to Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign where he found abortion a winning issue among Evangelical Christians. It created a newly reformed man who saw the light of victory if he became an ardent supporter of the anti-abortion movement. Trump firmly committed to the appointment of Supreme Court Justices who would overturn Roe v. Wade.

Trump nominated conservative Bret Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. Remember him? Mr. Pure and Clean who played around in college, but never let that interfere with his determination during confirmation hearings to throw a credible and respected woman, Professor Christine Blasey Ford, under the bus when she accused him of sexual assault. His subsequent appointment opened the right wing doors emboldening staunch anti-abortion Republicans to line up state legislation for potential Supreme Court review. The goal: overturn Roe v. Wade.

Where is it written that laws should only govern the reproductive rights of women? Nowhere. Should a man’s penis and reproductive ability be allowed to exist without laws dealing with the impact it can have? Perhaps not.

There are approximately 500,000 vasectomies performed on men each year. It’s a procedure that makes it near impossible for a man to impregnate a woman, and is performed privately in a doctor’s office or even in Planned Parenthood’s medical offices. It’s reproductive health after all, and sometimes can be helpful to women who don’t want children or any more children. But men have a choice when they decide to have a vasectomy, and no one is threatening to take that choice away.

There are no anti-vasectomy protestors lined up when a man walks into a medical office to have a vasectomy performed. No one screams “you’re killing a child” at a man walking into a facility to have the procedure, or shoves a picture of a fetus in his face, or forces him to wait and think about it before the procedure is performed. All of these things can and do happen to women going to clinics that perform abortions. A man’s reproductive rights have always been about the man’s decision, not a court of law telling him what to do.

I’ve been reporting on this story for a long, long time. As a young reporter in New York City, I covered the 1970 passage of the New York State law legalizing abortion three years before Roe v. Wade was enacted. Not long after, Sarah Weddington, the young attorney representing Jane Roe before the Supreme Court, and I shared a head table at a woman’s event. She spoke of her historic experience. I received an award for a television news series called “Rape”. We were living at a time of critical change for women, and looked to a future that would continue making life better and more equal for women.

We cannot go backward.

If abortion is against your religious or moral beliefs, no one is telling you to have the procedure. But millions of other women in this country need to continue having the legal right to make their own decisions when it comes to pregnancy. No group of religious or political extremists has a right to force their thinking on me or any other woman. I’ll respect you if you respect me.

Not Out To Lunch At 75 by marilyn salenger

My selfie 15.jpg

A woman’s age was supposed to be kept secret. Whether for vanity or professional reasons, that was society’s thinking for many generations. It was only in the early 70s that revealing our age became a sign of freedom or liberation. We began to rebel against negative stereotypes and stand up for ourselves saying very simply but rather boldly, “This is who I am and this is how old I am.”

I’ve never liked stereotypes and bucked them subtly and not so subtly all of my life. With that preface, I’m happy to share with you that I’m turning 75 this week and am not an ‘old lady’ despite the years. Old is a destination. Older is the process of getting there.

The picture above was taken in November 2018 as a casual attempt at an untouched selfie. The only thing that’s not true me in that picture is the color of my hair. I need a little help these days to get back to my natural color which I like better than the alternative. People are either very surprised or semi-shocked when I tell them how old I am. No, I don’t look my age or sound my age thanks to a great set of designer genes gifted by my mom and dad. But how am I supposed to look and sound?

People have asked me what its like turning 75, and I respond by saying it’s different than turning 74. That milestone thing conjures up a lot of thinking. It’s as if I’m bucking yet another societal norm sharing that I just don’t feel my new age, however that age is supposed to feel. I still love to work, and I still love to play.

I say all of this despite having survived two different cancers in the last six years and feeling the pains of arthritis creeping into places that used to make me a pretty damn good tennis player. Some parts of growing older we could all do without. It’s not always easy, sometimes it’s scary, but then being a real grown up at any age isn’t always easy either. I came close to death at the age of 29 from a rare disease, and there hasn’t been one day since that time that I’ve taken for granted. I feel blessed and grateful beyond any words that can be written.

My generation is living longer and approaching that ridiculous term, the golden years, differently than many of those who came before us. We’re keeping at it longer, as long as we can keep at whatever it is we’re doing. We want to continue feeling valued, and don’t like being treated like an “old” person when it’s done in a derogatory way. Deference is one thing. Discrimination is another.

After I left TV news, I said the next act would be the challenge. Little did I know how many acts were yet to come. The one thing I know today is that the word retirement has never been a part of my personal thought process. Work has been one of the major drivers in my life, and I’ve been my own boss for many years. Retirement is simply alien to me, and a lot of others as well. That doesn’t mean I want to work 60 hours a week. You just begin to think about time differently, and it becomes more focused on what you really want to do and how you want to spend that time.

Many people do look forward to retiring, and that’s great if it works for them. The goal for all of us, on many issues, is choice. But for too large a number over 50, 60 or 70 years of age there isn’t any choice. Age discrimination exists in more professions than not. Pervasive Ageism was the first digital story I wrote for Forbes in 2012 highlighting the issue, especially for women. It’s against the law, but often hard to win the case. The fight needs to continue.

It’s a good news/bad news time to be older and wanting to work. A majority of older Americans over 50 report being pushed out of their jobs by their employers and forced into early retirement. But the Society For Human Resource Management (SHRM) tells us that there are more people over 65 in the workforce than we’ve had in the past three decades. It simply doesn’t make me feel good knowing that a Home Depot sales person was formerly an unemployed corporate executive. Or reading a New York Times story that tells us about midlife crisis hitting as young as 30 if you’re working in the digital world. Those 30-year-olds will eventually grow up to be older.

I am part of a large group that came of age with an activist spirit that drove many of us to try and empower change. And we did! This is not the time to stop. Let’s rebrand the terms senior and senior citizen which have come to be connected to many things negative that lead to unfortunate stereotyping. We need to see ads and commercials and stories that reflect our true diversity in every way.

I will always be working at something. It’s just a part of who I am. Once you’re a reporter you’re a reporter until the end of your days. It’s how you think. How you look at things. The instinctive curiosity that pushes you to keep asking who, what, where, when and how. Those five words were taught to me when I was studying to become a journalist in college. They continue to drive a love of learning new things and looking for the next challenge.

Stay tuned!

Ready Or Not - It’s 2020 Time by marilyn salenger

The good old days of the 2016 presidential campaign seem like only yesterday. Yes, Trump won the electoral college. Yes, Hillary won the popular vote. And yes, as each day continues to inform us, Russia played a critical role in rigging the election. There’s no “do over” in our election system. Our founding fathers went for stability when they set up our Constitution, but the 2016 election left things unsettled in a unique way.

The chaos of that time is nothing compared to what we have been living through since Donald Trump was elected. Just think back for a moment, to Trump’s Inauguration day. Our new president delivered a dark and defiant inaugural speech before moving on to make a theatrical show of signing his first executive orders, including one that would advance the repeal of the Affordable Care Act. He later demanded that we believe his Inauguration had the largest crowd - ever, despite proof to the contrary, and the term “alternate facts” was coined by his advisor Kellyanne Conway in his defense.

We were off and running, and our country has been operating in a state of political chaos ever since. We’ve never quite reached recovery mode. Trump has gotten used to creating his own style of governing in an attempt to resemble his favored autocratic role models, whether it’s Russia’s Vladimir Putin, Egypt’s president, Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, China’s Communist Party bosses, or Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince. Our allies have been dismissed, and too many domestic issues have been ignored or repudiated.

Donald Trump’s time in office increasingly feels as if it should have an unofficial asterisk beside the title.

But the time of rude awakening is coming. There are currently close to 20 investigations surrounding this White House and Trump, including Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian interference into the 2016 election, the Southern District Court of New York and the state of New York investigations amidst a growing number of congressional inquiries. The Democratic majority in control of the House of Representatives is committed to doing what the Republicans didn’t do these past two years - provide a check and balance system of governance.

The non-legal net result of all of these investigations has been to keep the tumult of 2016 election front and center in the public’s mind, creating the potential for political burnout just as the 2020 presidential race begins. That’s the last thing we need. How can a Democratic candidate running for president in this environment combat voter political fatigue? Come out big, strong and focused for the long haul.

In less than two months, we’ve seen a large Democratic field of presidential candidates emerge, with more announcements expected. The size and diversity of the field alone will make this a totally different kind of race for Democrats. While they seem to be operating with an “all in” mentality, there’s one potential liability based upon their sheer numbers. A big field of Democrats running for President can damage one another in the run up to the nomination. Think debates. Any damage done will absolutely be seized upon by Trump. Just think back.

Three years ago, the large field of Republican candidates in the 2016 race wrecked havoc upon themselves leaving each with some form of scarring. Donald Trump emerged as the last man standing. Amazingly enough, at this point in the 2020 race we can’t even say for certain whether or not Trump will actually be the Republican nominee. The results of all of the investigations surrounding him will, in all likelihood, be revealed during the next nearly two years of campaign time. That leaves a interesting question mark for Republicans going forward.

If Trump leaves office before his term has officially ended, Vice President Mike Pence would assume the office of president. If yet further unforeseen circumstances arise that remove Pence from the presidency, our Constitution dictates that the next in line is the Speaker of the House. Nancy Pelosi would then be sworn in as President of the United States.

That’s an interesting scenario.

The "Humanitarian" Who Isn't: Donald Trump by marilyn salenger

Photo by 9and10news.com

Photo by 9and10news.com

Almost a million people who work for our government still aren’t getting paid because of the partial government shutdown now in its 19th day. Not because we don’t have the money to pay them, but because they have become pawns in President Donald Trump’s political power game. He wants things his way or no way. If you can’t pay your rent or mortgage, buy food or put gas in your car, does he really care? It appears not. The severity for those involved is great. Businesses large and small will feel the trickle-down effect as the days go on. And it didn’t have to happen.

The partial shutdown is the result of a stalemate over Trump's demand for $5.7 billion dollars to fund a wall on the U.S.- Mexico border. This is the same wall Mexico was supposed to pay for, or at least that’s what Trump repeatedly told us during his campaign. But Mexico isn’t going to pay for the wall. No surprise.

A short term funding proposal was put together by Republicans at the end of the year that would have kept the government open. It was initially agreed to by Trump even though it had no money in it for his wall. Then conservative pundits stepped in and apparently swayed his thinking. That wall is a big crowd pleaser for his base. So at the last minute Trump torpedoed the Republican proposal, and on December 21st, the partial government shutdown began.

In order to justify his action, the president went on national television to tell us all about a “humanitarian crisis” taking place at our southern border. “A crisis of the heart, and a crisis of the soul”, he said. But whose heart and whose soul and what crisis was he talking about? There was only one ominous reference in his speech to those going without money because of the shutdown he has ordered. The issues at our southern border need to be resolved, but at what cost?

There are so many parts of this latest Trump episode coming together to create a vivid reality of the man who is a master at diverting attention to get attention. His national address turned a prime time spotlight on once again, but that was it. It was a political speech telling us how bad the Democrats are for not giving him the $5.7 billion dollars he wants to build a wall - part of which is already in place. The shutdown and the speech take momentary attention away from special counsel Robert Mueller’s work, as well as most things Russia and Trump.

This is the first time that Democrats have control of Congress since Trump was elected, and he doesn’t seem to know how to handle it. Or Nancy Pelosi. His fall back in dealing with them has become the one thing he is used to doing. Make it an either/or situation. I win. You lose. But our democracy doesn’t work that way.

Democrats have offered $1.3 billion to enhance border security. Trump, the man trying to save face for his base, says it’s not enough. But who says that negotiations on border security can’t continue if 800,000 people are brought back to work and get paid? Trump and the slew of Republicans that remain under his spell who don’t care about the humanitarian crisis of their own making. Somehow the administration’s announcement that food stamps would be available to help some people affected by the shutdown just doesn’t do it. It was unconscionable.