Religion and Politics 2016 by marilyn salenger

Religion and politics are playing an increasingly prominent role in the 2016 presidential race in ways unique to the times. Evangelical voters are being aggressively and very publicly courted by Republican candidates, and Democrats have the potential to elect the first Jewish President. If Bernie Sanders defeats Hillary Clinton in either the Iowa or New Hampshire primaries, that alone would make him the first Jewish candidate to win a primary contest in either party. 

Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio and even Donald Trump have been promoting their religious beliefs as if they are part of their political platforms. In the last Republican debate, Rubio and Cruz appeared to be going head to head on who was the most religious. Sanders, on the other hand, talks little about his faith. Clinton sometimes discusses it. 

Half of all Americans, according to a recent Pew Research Center survey, say religious conservatives exert too much control over the Republican Party, while slightly fewer say secular liberals have too much control over the Democratic party. The study also found that two-thirds of Republicans want a president who shares their religious beliefs compared to less than half the Democrats. Religion has become part of the partisan political divide with sometimes ominous implications for the future. 

Given the current environment, one is led to ask in what ways and to what degree, if any, will the next president use his or her faith as a basis to push their agenda? Among all else, the judicial system stands to be significantly affected. The next President will appoint one or more Supreme Court Justices and many lower court judges. Roe v. Wade, the landmark decision making abortion safe and legal, hangs with the balance of the Supreme Court as lower courts are aggressively trying to chip away at the ruling.

For many, faith is a private matter. But today, privacy is becoming a thing of the past. A presidential candidate's faith has always been formally known, but I don't recall President Dwight Eisenhower's religion. It was not an issue. That was left for his successor to deal with in 1960. President John F. Kennedy's Catholic faith became a significant factor in his electability with questions about whether he would take direction from the Vatican. Kennedy chose not to campaign on issues of his faith, and went on to become the country's first Catholic President defeating Richard Nixon who was a Quaker.

It’s clear in 2016 the separation between church and state is becoming even more blurred.

 

 

 

 

It's Sarah and Donald Time by marilyn salenger

Photo by Alex Hanson/CC BY-2.0

Photo by Alex Hanson/CC BY-2.0

Sarah Palin's rousing public endorsement of Donald Trump at an Iowa rally puts together quite a team as Trump continues his path to a Republican presidential nomination. Two people who love the hugeness of the limelight without the factual specifics that previously mattered in politics are now standing side by side. 

The 2008 vice presidential candidate and former Alaska governor seemed almost euphoric as she was once again able to share being front and center on a big political public stage. Palin delivered what could be considered a mock convention nominating speech, as if it was a rip-roaring right-wing conservative talk show. She’s got the formula down pat. Trump stood next to her looking pleased, but slightly uncomfortable. He never once looked at Palin as she spoke, instead listening and assessing the crowd's response. 

Palin has chosen to turn her back on Senator John McCain, the man who first put her in the spotlight as his vice presidential running mate in 2008. While he remained loyal to her, she’s cast loyalty to the wind instead endorsing the man who has attacked McCain. Trump has refused to call the former prisoner of war a hero saying, “I like people that weren’t captured.”

This says as much about Palin as it does about Trump. For him it's all about winning. Perhaps much more so than any good he could do as president. While winning an election is what it's all about for any politician, with Trump it's more than part of the endgame. It's the beginning, the middle and the end.

He is the consummate construction tycoon who will do almost anything to make a deal and feed an insatiable ego. There's a continual bit of falseness that hangs over a substantial part of his candidacy. It leaves one to wonder if he really believes what he's saying, or is he just saying it to appeal to his target audience. In some ways he reminds me of J.R. Ewing, that infamous and devious oil tycoon of the popular television show Dallas. Trump going after Palin's endorsement fits into that entire scenario.

Palin swings Trump all the way to the right politically. It's a marriage made in the anti-establishment part of the Republican party that is salivating over the outrageousness of Trump. They love it. In Palin’s endorsement speech, she spun Trump almost better than he can spin himself. Facts be damned. 

Trump according to Palin:

"He's from the private sector not a politician. Hallelujah." She must have forgotten that she's a politician herself.

"He's a billionaire who is not elitist." Is there anyone who knows Trump who would call him a man of the people? " 

He's a self-made man." she told the audience, leaving out the fact that he began his career with a HUGE amount of help from his wealthy father.

"He's a strict constitutionalist." Now there's one to get us thinking.

Trump's son Eric later called Palin "refreshing," and a " fighter like my dad." But he too appeared slightly uncomfortable in the Palin aura. The young Trump said she had gotten to know his family during a visit with them in New York City. One can just imagine a down-home dinner table setting in Trump Tower as they discussed her position in a potential Trump White House.  

Wake Up America! by marilyn salenger

Donald Trump has once again created a new reality show. This time no apprentice is needed because it’s all about himself. He can say whatever he wants. Do whatever he wants. And his rules call for no penalties. Trump doesn't believe he should accept any. It's a very well thought out production.

Trump's show, however, is creating serious problems that are too often aimed at bringing out the worst in people. That's what happens when a production is based upon negativity.

With near total abandon, Trump throws his racial, religious, gender and personal slurs around in a stream of consciousness that doesn't stop. The fact that it's riling up hatred and prejudice that have serious consequences seems to be almost beside the point. He does it with a strong attempt at righteous arrogance, and no apparent concern for those consequences. With Trump it's all about winning - no matter the cost.

In France, Trump could potentially be prosecuted for hate speech. Germany is trying to clamp down on incendiary speech in their country, and the UK is talking about banning Trump for allegedly violating their hate speech laws. Three of our closest allies understand consequences. It’s becoming increasingly clear that Trump does not.

Is this really what we want to see in the next leader of the Free World? 

And yet we continue to watch this man find new ways to play dangerous games with people's thinking, carelessly but carefully whipping them up as he goes along. It's one thing to disagree with an opponent’s position, but it’s another to stir up hate. Trump’s reality show needs a serious course correction.